Turn findings into technical action
Architecture, remediation plans, implementation procedures, configuration guidance, and validation criteria for customer teams.
Single-Framework Assessment
Know what matters before you commit to the larger effort.
A control-by-control Cyberneza gap assessment against SOC 2, ISO 27001, or CMMC / NIST 800-171 establishes where you stand, which gaps create real risk, and what should happen next—without forcing you into a large engagement before the problem is understood.
Cyber AB RP (CPN 76768) · CISSP · CRISC · CCSK v5 · CCZT | 29+ years in cybersecurity | Fixed-fee | Veteran-owned
Single-Framework Assessment
- Control-by-control review against SOC 2, ISO 27001, or CMMC / NIST 800-171 — tool-agnostic
- Evidence inventory and readiness score
- Severity-rated findings prioritized by risk, dependency, and business impact
- Technical and documentation findings separated so engineering work is clear
- Remediation roadmap with effort estimates and a recommended sequence
- Executive summary suitable for leadership, an auditor, or a customer
Cyber insurance has its own assessment.
Cyber insurance underwriting has its own assessment, focused on the controls and conditions carriers ask about rather than a compliance framework. If two or more frameworks apply, they are assessed together and scoped as one engagement.
What happens after ASSESS
The assessment becomes an execution plan, not a shelf document.
Validate the resulting state
Review controls, evidence, documentation, ownership, and remaining issues before the assurance milestone.
Keep the program healthy
Maintain risk decisions, evidence, technical direction, and changing requirements through an ongoing advisory relationship.
Engineering depth
When the gap is technical, the recommendation should be technical.
Cyberneza brings security engineering and architecture experience to the assessment so findings can translate into actionable implementation guidance. Your technical teams retain production-change authority and execute approved changes through established change management.
FAQ
Common questions
Can't Vanta tell us what we're missing?
Vanta is excellent at tracking automated checks — tests that pass or fail. But it doesn't assess the quality of your policies, whether your processes are actually followed, or whether your evidence will hold up under auditor scrutiny. Platform compliance is not the same as program compliance. This assessment covers both.
When should we do a gap assessment?
Before you engage an auditor. The gap assessment identifies what needs to be fixed so you can remediate before the audit starts. Doing this work during the audit costs more and takes longer.
What if we've already started compliance work?
That's fine. We'll assess what you've done so far, identify what's still missing, and give you a clear picture of remaining work. This is a common place to get stuck — partway through compliance on your own.
Do you help with remediation too?
Yes. The gap assessment produces the roadmap. If you want help executing that roadmap — writing policies, implementing controls, configuring Vanta, preparing evidence — we can scope a follow-on engagement for that work.
SOC 2 or ISO 27001 — which should we pursue?
That depends on your market. If your customers are primarily U.S.-based, SOC 2 is usually the right starting point. If you sell internationally, ISO 27001 may be required. We'll help you decide during the initial consultation — and if you need both, the gap assessment can cover both frameworks.
What does it cost?
A fixed fee for a single framework, scoped before work begins — see the pricing page for the current figure. Two or more frameworks are assessed together and scoped as one engagement. 100% credited toward qualifying follow-on work that begins within 90 days of final assessment delivery.
Start with the smallest useful engagement.
We’ll confirm scope before the assessment begins so you know exactly what is being evaluated and what the fee covers.